Articles 28 and 29 of the GDPR require a “by a contract or other legal act” in order to engage a processor.
Such document must include:
- the subject-matter and duration of the processing, the nature and purpose of the processing, the type of personal data and categories of data subjects;
- the confidentiality agreement;
- assurance that persons authorised to process the personal data have committed themselves to confidentiality;
- the prohibition to use sub-suppliers (i.e. sub-processors) without authorization by the controller;
- the assurance, in case of use of sub-suppliers, to have a contract (or act) with the same provisions for the personal data processing included in the contract (or act) with the controller;
- the instructions from the controller for the personal data processing;
- the prohibition, without controller’s authorization, to transfer the personal data in extra-UE Countries or to allow access to the personal data from extra-UE Countries (b)
- the assurance to have periodical reviews of the effectiventes of technical and organizational measures;
- the committment to assist the controller for the fulfilment, in less than 30 days, of the data subjects requests;
- the committment to communicate to the controller all data breaches or potential data breaches and to assist the controller in case of such events;
- the committment to delete or return all the personal data to the controller after the end of the activities;
- the right of audit.
Such requirements require a big effort and look more applicable to organizations than physical persons.
Considering this and a Giancarlo Butti article (https://blog.europrivacy.org/it/2016/07/19/the-internal-data-processor-and-the-gdpr/), it really looks like that only organizations are intended to be processors.
And this is logical: internal responsibilities cannot be in 3 levels (controller, processors and employees), but may be different, and regulated by internal organization charts and job descriptions and all governed by the top management (acting as controller representative).
grazie dell’intervento
sto anch’io lavorando molto su questo tema nel rapporto tra ASL e strutture private accreditata/contrattualizzate che erogano prestazioni in nome e per conto della stessa ASL
segnalo il documento pubblicato dall’autorità spagnola all’inizio di gennaio 2017 che dà indicazioni sulle modlaità di creazione del contratto
https://www.agpd.es/portalwebAGPD/temas/reglamento/common/pdf/directricescontratos.pdf
saluti a tutti
Grazie mille. Il documento spagnolo è molto interessante (anche se non datato!).
Chissà che il nostro Garante vorrà proporre qualcosa di simile…